1. Flexible solar modules tend to have a higher upfront cost per watt compared to traditional rigid panels. This is mainly due to the thin-film technology used in flexible panels, which is less mature and efficient than crystalline silicon panels. Traditional panels, especially monocrystalline and polycrystalline, are widely produced and have lower manufacturing costs due to economies of scale.
  2. Flexible solar modules can be cheaper to install. Their lightweight design and flexible nature mean they often don’t require heavy mounting structures or additional labor for complex installations. This can result in reduced labor and material costs during installation in applications where weight or surface constraints are present.
  3. Flexible modules are lighter and more compact, leading to lower transportation and handling costs. Traditional rigid panels, being heavier and bulkier, incur higher shipping expenses.
  4. Traditional solar panels tend to have a longer lifespan (25-30 years) and higher energy efficiency (15-22%), which means they generate more power over time compared to flexible modules (typically 10-15% efficiency and a 10-20 year lifespan). This can make traditional panels more cost-effective over the long term, depending on the installation location and use case.